Scooby doo and the monster of mexico part 3

Scooby doo and the monster of mexico part 3

Just send me to hell or New York City, it would be about the same to me Hank Williams Jr Im sure that some of the points being made about inconsistencies are on the mark. But screw that; i thought the movie was fantastic, and nothings gonna change my mind. God was my co-pilot, but we crashed in the Andes and i had to eat him. Location: Dublin, Ireland I thought it was a pretty good movie. I was wondering, though, how they did the shots of downtown London without anyone in them. I could understand a shot of the skyscrapers without lights. that could be done by computer graphics or models correct me if thats not how they did it, but how did they do the scenes where he is walking around downtown scooby doo and the monster of mexico part 3 anyone around and also with the added props like the trashed bus and other assorted post-riot trash. They did it by filming very early in the morning. You will notice the the sun is quite loq in the scenes. The held the traffic and people back. They had quite a problem with drunk clubbers IIRC. They also did it quick. One of two attempts and that was it. Some of the scenes also had the cars and people digitally removed from the background. I really liked the film. Yeah it has plot holes but so what. I looked at it with my sister who is a jumpy screamy wagon when looking at these types of movies. The movie freaked her out. Her reactions and the movie freaked me out. I looked at it to get a bit freaked out and it worked. What? Come on! That woman was so stupid! What rational person would book into a hotel in the middle of nowhere with a creepy clerk who seems to have some abnormal relationship with his mother, and then take a shower? Hasnt she seen any movies? I think what attracts the kind of nit-picking I did to the movie is that the really major flaws werent with aspects of the film like, how long could the infected survive, or why didnt they attack each other, or why werent there any radio/satellite broadcasts. When you go to see a scooby doo and the monster of mexico part 3 movie, or science fiction or fantasy, you start with a blanket suspension of disbelief on the physics of the movie that make it what it is, whether thats undead monsters, warp drives or dragons. But then you expect the characters to live by the internal scooby doo and the monster of mexico part 3 the movie establishes. You especially expect them to react in ways that any person would that is what allows you to sympathize with them and their conflicts. This is true regardless of whether the main characters are actually human or not. They have to have understandable motivations for us to identify with them as characters. 28 Days didnt keep the characters tight. The easiest example of this to look at is the cab driving father. He holes up in their flat because he fears for his daughters life, he believes leaving would be riskier than staying. This is a great set-up. We can all identify with love of family, and the difficultly of weighing known risks against mostly unknown risks. But then the first thing he does when he makes the decision to leave the flat is to act like an idiot and drive through that tunnel and pretend he is at a monster truck rally all with his beloved daughter in the car. Its not the inconsistencies in the zombie logic that bothered me those got covered under the blanket suspension of disbelief, it is that the main characters seemed to have no consistency to their motives and actions. This movie had awesome potential, the mood the director set, the slow reveal of information so that you were as much in the dark about things as Jim all that was good. If the main characters had acted in a way that made sense, that you could have looked at and thought yeah, I would have done the same thing then this could have been a really great movie. It just wasted its potential with really dumb mistakes. weirdal you ask some pretty good questions in the original post, but whoever you got to answer them for you seems pretty stupid. Q: I just saw Cold Mountain. Q: Well, he walked from Virginia to North Carolina, across fields, mountains, dirt roads, through the snow, and I only saw him drink water once. One drink of water over a month, and he was walking every day? A: Pretty unrealistic.

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: